Prompt library · AI · 25 prompts
Prompts from the guide
Company know-how out of your head: AI interviews, Lucid, and Notion
25 prompts from this guide. Fill in whatever sits in [square brackets] — your own context, the document text or the name of your tool. That context is exactly what separates a generic answer from a usable one.
The rough list: what actually gets done here
I'm the owner of a metalworking workshop with 12 people: custom fabrication (gates, railings, steel structures, staircases), on-site installations, and service. I want to list all the recurring processes in the company so I can pick which ones to document first. Walk me through it area by area: sales (inquiries, quotes, contracts), jobs and production, purchasing and stock, installation and service, finance (invoicing, payments, reminders), people (hiring, onboarding, attendance), operations (machines, inspections, workplace safety, vehicles). For each area, ask me 3-5 "what happens when..." questions and build a list of processes from my answers as we go. A process = a repeated activity with a start and an end, not a department. Ask me about one area at a time so I can keep up. At the end, give me one list: process name, what it is in one sentence, how often it runs (daily / weekly / monthly / occasionally), and who actually does it today — names, not job titles.
Bus factor: which processes ride on one person
Here's our list of processes from the inventory [paste the list]. Help me pick 10 to document first. For each process, ask me (one at a time, briefly): 1. How many people can do the whole thing today, without help? (bus factor) 2. What happens if that person is out for 14 days — does the process wait, does someone half-cover it, or does it stop and cause damage? 3. How often does the process run? 4. Has this process ever cost money because it was done wrong or late? Roughly how much, order of magnitude? Build a table from the answers: process, bus factor, impact of an outage (stops / slows down / waits), frequency, history of mishaps. Propose a documentation order: process with a bus factor of 1 that stops completely on an outage and runs often go first. Justify each row's ranking in one sentence — I'll make the final call.
Interview schedule: a calendar instead of good intentions
We have a ranked list of 10 processes to document [paste it] and three people who hold them in their heads: owner (quotes, complaints, purchasing), foreman (production, planning, collaboration, shipping), bookkeeper (invoicing, reminders). We all know the onboarding process in bits and pieces. Build a 6-week interview schedule: 2 interviews a week, 45-60 minutes each. For each one, note: the process, who's being interviewed, what they should prepare beforehand (the last concrete case, materials — notebook, spreadsheets, sample documents), and who will review the interview (a second person who knows the process at least partially). Spread out one person's interviews over time so they don't get three evenings in a row. I want the output as a table I can print and pin up in the workshop.
The core interview prompt
You'll run a structured interview with me about one company
process. I'm [the owner of a metalworking workshop, 12 people] and
the process is [a price quote for custom fabrication]. Goal:
capture how we ACTUALLY do this here, so a capable new hire could
follow it from the record. A diagram and a knowledge-base page will
be built from this interview later.
Interview rules:
- Ask ONE question at a time and wait for the answer. No
questionnaires.
- Start with the trigger: what starts the process and how I'd
recognize that it started.
- Then walk me through the steps. For each one, ask: what gets
done, who does it, in what / where (system, spreadsheet, paper),
what the step ends with, and how the result gets handed off.
- When I say something vague ("I just calculate it"), stop me and
ask for specifics: based on what, where do the numbers come
from, what if something's missing.
- After the main path, ask about exceptions: "When does it go
differently?" — rush jobs, a big customer, missing material,
vacations. For each exception: how I'd recognize it and what
happens instead of the standard.
- At the end: what has historically gone wrong in this process,
what it cost, and what's been done differently since.
- Keep structured notes as we go. If I contradict myself, flag it.
When I say "done," end the interview and summarize what's still
missing.
Start with the first question.Anchoring in the last case: "walk me through yesterday's job"
Change of technique: instead of a general description, let's walk through ONE concrete, recent case. Take the last [price quote] I did — [a railing for an apartment building, last week] — and walk me through it step by step: what exactly did I do first, then what, where did I look things up, who did I call, what slowed me down. Ask about the timeline and facts, not opinions. If I describe a step that differed from the usual procedure in that job, ask what the more common version is and how often it comes up. At the end, compare: this is how the last case went vs. this is what the standard looks like — and list the differences. Differences aren't a mistake, they're the most valuable part.
Confession by voice: walking the process on foot
We'll do the interview by voice. I'm the production foreman, and as I walk through the shop I'll tell you how I plan the production week and release jobs onto the machines. Ask me following the structure: trigger, steps, who, systems, exceptions, mishaps — but one short question at a time, we're talking, not writing. If I mention a machine, a whiteboard, or a sheet of paper, ask exactly what's on it and who's allowed to write on it. Don't summarize what I said after every answer — just keep asking. Give me the full summary only when I say "done."
Cross-checking: two people, one process, two truths
Here are two interview transcripts about the SAME process [order intake and release into production]: the owner's version [paste] and the foreman's version [paste]. Compare them and give me three lists: 1. Agreements — what both describe the same way (keep this brief). 2. Contradictions — where the versions disagree: who does what, order of steps, who's responsible for what. Quote both versions for each contradiction. 3. Blind spots — what one version describes and the other doesn't mention at all. Don't judge who's right — for each contradiction, prepare one question we can clarify together at the table.
The process record: turning the interview into a standard entry
Build a structured record in markdown from our whole conversation about the [price quote] process: ## Basics Process name, purpose in one sentence, trigger, what the process ends with (definition of done), how often it runs. ## Roles Who appears in the process and what they do — attach a real name to each role. ## Main-path steps Numbered list: step, who, in what/where, output of the step. Keep it brief — details go in notes below. ## Decision points Where the process branches, what the decision is based on, who decides. ## Exceptions Off-standard situations: how to recognize it → what happens instead. ## Systems and artifacts Where things live (spreadsheets, notebooks, programs, binders) — no passwords. ## Known risks and past mishaps What went wrong, what it cost, what safeguard exists since. ## Open questions What the interview didn't cover, or where I contradicted myself. Write only what came up in the interview — don't guess at anything. Where information is missing, write OPEN instead of filling in a plausible answer.
The first map: main path and decision points
From the attached record of the [price quote] process, create a
new document [Process: price quote] via the Lucid connector with a
flowchart.
Rules:
- Only the main path and decision points from the record — no
exceptions, those will be in the text documentation. Target max
12-15 steps.
- Start: trigger (an inquiry comes in). End: definition of done
(a quote sent and logged).
- Steps as rectangles, decisions as diamonds with a question and
branch labels (yes/no, under 30k / over 30k).
- Step text: verb + object ("measure on site," "calculate
material"), no paragraphs.
- Where the record says who does a step, add the role in
parentheses under the step text.
- Don't guess anything — where you're missing information for a
connection, ask me instead of quietly filling it in.
When done, send me the document link and a short list of what you
did NOT include from the record, so I can check it.Swimlanes: who holds what, and where it gets handed off
In the same Lucid document, create a second version of the [order intake and release into production] process as a swimlane diagram. - Lanes by role: owner, sales rep, foreman, production, bookkeeper. Only roles that actually appear in the process. - Put each step in the lane of whoever DOES it (not whoever's officially responsible for it — if those differ, tell me as a note). - Arrows between lanes = a handoff. Label each one with WHAT gets handed off (paper, email, a spreadsheet entry, verbal). - Highlight handoffs labeled "verbal" in color — those are our risk spots. Then give me one list of all the verbal handoffs.
Iteration: the map gets tuned by prompt, not by redrawing
Update the [Process: price quote] diagram in Lucid based on the review with the foreman: - Split the "calculate material" step into two: "list material items" and "check what's in stock, price the rest with the supplier." - After the "job over 30k?" decision, on the YES branch, add a step "30% deposit before starting" (done by the bookkeeper). - Rename "send quote" to "send quote and log in the quote register." - Remove the "check with production" step — it doesn't happen in practice, it was an idealization. Don't change anything else. Afterward, give me a list of the changes you made so I can check them off against my notes.
Org chart: who actually answers for what
Create an org chart of our company via the Lucid connector in a new document [Organization]. Structure: owner (sales, quotes, key customers) → production foreman (planning, production, collaboration, shipping) → [list of production people with their trade: 2 welders, 2 metalworkers, bending machine operator...]; alongside the foreman, an installation crew [installation lead + 2 installers]; directly under the owner, a bookkeeper (invoicing, payroll, reminders) and a sales rep (inquiries, quote register). For each person, add 2-3 main responsibilities on the second line — not their job title from a contract. Don't leave anyone out, even a part-timer belongs here.
When the other diagram types make sense
Create a mind map [Company process map] via the Lucid connector: company name in the center, our domains at the first level [paste], processes from the inventory at the second level [paste the list]. Highlight the processes from the top ten. For processes that already have a finished map and page, add a checkmark after the name. Don't add anything else — this is an overview, not content.
Structure: domains, processes, procedures, templates
We're going to build our company's knowledge base [metalworking workshop, 12 people] via the Notion connector. Don't create ANYTHING yet — propose a structure: - root page [How We Do Things Here] - domain sections following this list from our inventory [paste domains] - within each domain, space for process, procedure, and template pages - a [Process register] database with properties: name, domain, owner (person), status (interviewed / mapped / written / verified), criticality (bus factor 1 / important / routine), last review (date), next review (date), link to the Lucid diagram (URL) Give me the proposal as a tree, so I can see what goes where, and ask me questions wherever you're unsure about the placement. Build the structure once I approve it.
The process page: a consistent template
From the attached record of the [price quote] process, create a page via the Notion connector in the [Sales] domain, following our template: 1. Summary — 3 sentences: what the process is for, what starts it, what it ends with. 2. Process map — insert a link to the Lucid diagram here [paste URL] and a note: "See the map for the detailed flow; this page carries the details." 3. Steps — a numbered list of the main path; for each step, who, in what, and a link to the procedure if a separate guide exists. 4. Decision rules — exact criteria from the record (limits, rates linked to the rate sheet, who approves). 5. Exceptions — a "when..., then..." list from the record, including who's allowed to authorize the exception. 6. Where things live — systems and artifacts: what's in which spreadsheet, binder, program. No passwords — where access is needed, write "access: see password manager." 7. What's historically gone wrong — lessons from mishaps in the record. 8. Open questions — unresolved points; for each, who needs to resolve it. Keep the phrasing from the record, don't polish it into corporate language — "send it to zinc" is our actual term. At the end of the page, add a line: Owner: [name] · Last review: [date] · Source: interview [date]. Then create a row in the Process register and link it to this page.
Linking diagram and page: two systems, one whole
Check the consistency of our process documentation: 1. Go through the Process register in Notion and, for each entry, verify that the Lucid diagram link points to an existing document. 2. Search our Lucid folder and list diagrams that have no matching page in Notion (orphans). 3. For processes with status "verified," compare the diagram's steps against the page's Steps section: list the differences (a step missing from the page or the map, different order, different names). Give me a clear table of findings. Don't fix anything — I'll approve fixes one at a time.
A new hire who trains themselves
From our Notion knowledge base, build an onboarding plan for a new welder-metalworker [Ondřej], starting [date]. He'll work in production under the foreman, and do installations over time. 1. Go through the Process register and pick the processes where the production or installation role appears. 2. Build a 3-week plan: what to read which day (links to specific pages), what to look through in the maps, what to have shown to him physically in the shop, and by whom (names from the org chart). 3. For each week, add 5 check questions he should be able to answer by the end of it — the foreman will go through them with him on Friday. 4. Separately, list what's missing from the base for his role (a process where his role is mentioned but has no page or procedure) — that's our gap, not his problem. Create a page [Onboarding: Ondřej] in the People domain from this.
A new hire who trains themselves
Go through our swimlane diagrams in Lucid and find all the lanes with the [production] or [installation] role — that'll be the new hire's [Ondřej] role. Derive his onboarding rounds from the maps: 1. List every handoff he'll be part of: what he takes from whom, what he hands to whom, in what form (paper, log entry, verbal) — with a link to the process. 2. Build a "walk it through in person" checklist from that: for each handoff, who he should walk through it with once, in the shop, and what to have shown to him. 3. Put handoffs marked "verbal" in the maps at the top — that's where a new hire most easily loses information, and nobody notices. Save the output as a subpage of [Onboarding: Ondřej] in Notion.
Answers from the base instead of a phone call to the owner
You answer our company's operational questions EXCLUSIVELY from the Notion knowledge base. Rules: - For every answer, cite the page you're drawing from. - When the answer isn't in the base, or is ambiguous, say so explicitly and point to the process owner from the Process register — never guess an answer. - When the question involves values (prices, rates, limits), quote the value along with the page's last review date, so it's clear how fresh it is. - Keep collecting questions the base couldn't answer; list them for me on request as items to fill in. Question: [when does a deposit get taken on a job, and how much?]
Templates and checklists: documents that carry out the process
From the [outbound inspection and shipping] process page in our base, build a shipping checklist: one A4 page, items in the order the check is actually done, a checkbox and a note space next to each item. Last lines: who checked it, date, signature. Shop-floor language, no formal wording. Save it into the Templates section in Notion and add a link from the process page. Put a version and date in the checklist's header — when the process changes, the checklist has to be regenerated too.
The coverage manual: a vacation as a product of the base
The owner will be unreachable [August 3-17], covered by the foreman [Franta] with support from the bookkeeper [Jana]. Build a coverage manual for that period from our knowledge base: 1. Go through the Process register and list the processes where the owner is the only role — for each, exactly who will do what instead in August, with a link to the page and the relevant step. 2. Decision authority: pull every "owner approves" spot from the pages' decision rules, and propose an August mode for each — the stand-in can decide up to a limit / it waits / call the owner. The owner reviews and edits the proposals. 3. Build a "call the owner only if" list — situations that, according to the base, nobody else is allowed or able to resolve. 4. At the end: contacts, deadlines falling due in that period (from the register and the pages), and what's deliberately being pushed to after the vacation. Save it as a page [Coverage: August] and share it with Franta and Jana.
Change the process, change the documentation, in one move
The [steel stock purchasing] process changed: [new supplier — orders go through a portal instead of by phone, order by Wednesday 12:00, the minimum order changed, pricing is on the portal]. Make the change across the whole documentation: 1. Update the Lucid diagram: replace the "order by phone" step with the portal steps, update the timing note. 2. Update the Notion page: the Steps section, "Where things live" (add the portal, access "see password manager"), and "Decision rules" (new minimum). 3. Add a line to the page's change history: date, what changed, why, who approved it [Petr]. 4. Update the last-review date in the Process register. 5. Check whether any other page or template still references the old procedure — list what still needs to change. Before you start, summarize the changes you're about to make — I'll approve them.
A quarterly review in one prompt
Quarterly documentation review. Go through the Process register in Notion and: 1. List the processes whose next-review date has passed, sorted by criticality, with the owner for each. 2. For each owner, prepare a short check questionnaire (max 5 questions) tailored to their process: "Does step X still hold? Did Y change? Any new exception?" — base it on the page's content. 3. List pages with a status other than "verified" that are older than a month — those are unfinished loose ends. 4. List the open questions from every page, in one place. From items 1-4, build a 30-minute review meeting agenda: what to cover, in what order, and what can be settled with just a "no change" confirmation.
Security: concentrated know-how has to be protected
Run a security review of the Notion knowledge base: 1. Search all pages for anything that looks like a password, PIN, access code, API key, or login credentials — including in notes and page change histories. 2. Look for customer personal data: names paired with an address, phone number, email, national ID numbers, license plates. Sample examples on pages should be fictional — flag any that look real. 3. List pages shared outside the company workspace or via a public link. 4. List guests and external accounts with access, and which pages. Give me the findings in a table: where, what, severity, suggested fix (move to the password manager / anonymize / revoke sharing). Don't delete or touch anything — we'll resolve every finding by hand.
Pro tip
You have access to our Notion knowledge base and our Lucid maps. Play the role of an experienced operations manager taking over running the company starting Monday — the owner is unreachable for 14 days. You may not ask any human, only the base. Go through the documentation and answer: 1. Which everyday situations over the next 14 days could you handle from the base alone? (an inquiry comes in, a complaint, missing material, a welder calls in sick) 2. Where would you get stuck — what won't the base tell you? Be specific: which piece of information, on which page, is missing. 3. Which three pages are the weakest, and why? 4. Be strict: could this company actually be handed over based on this documentation? What would have to exist for the answer to be yes? Don't go easy on us — every gap you find now is a gap the stand-in won't find in August, or the buyer won't find during due diligence.