Hlídač státu as a journalism tool

Use only data from Hlídač státu — don't add anything from memory.

For the institution [agency name]:
1. Find its company ID and confirm it's the right entity
   (registered address, type).
2. Return the K-index for every available year. If there isn't
   one, say so.
3. List contracts from the last three years flagged as having
   serious legal issues.
4. List contracts with a hidden price.
5. List contracts whose value sits just under the public
   procurement threshold.

For each contract, give: date, counterparty with its company ID,
amount, subject, and an identifier for looking it up.
At the end, state how many results there were in total and how
many you're showing — I need to know if I'm looking at the first
page or at everything.

For the company [name], find its company ID and then build a
profile of its business with the state:

- a summary of its dealings with the state (contracts, subsidies, risks)
- the volume of contracts by year, as a table
- its five largest contracts with date, contracting authority, and amount
- insolvency proceedings by company ID, including the company's role in them
- criminal records for the legal entity
- unreliable VAT payer status
- subsidiary companies

For each figure, note which source it comes from.
Where data doesn't exist, write “not in the data” — don't
estimate or fill in gaps.

For the company [name, company ID] and for its directors and
partners (look them up as people), find:

1. donations to political parties — who, when, to whom, how much
2. contracts and procurement with the state — when and with whom

Build a single timeline with both series side by side, sorted
by date.

Don't draw any conclusion about a connection. Just show me where
donations and contracts sit close together in time, and for each
such pair note what BORING explanation could account for it.

Search for subsidies in the area of [e.g. sport] awarded in the
years [range] to recipients based in [region/municipality].

Sort by amount descending, return the top 30.
For each: recipient with company ID, program, project, amount,
year, grantor.

Then separately list recipients who appear more than once in
the results, with their combined total.

In the Chamber of Deputies transcripts, find speeches that
mention [topic / program name / company name], from [date] onward.

Return a table: date, speaker, session, topic, one quoted sentence.
Sort from most recent. Then for the three most relevant, give me
the full passage of the speech so I can read it in context.

State how many records the query found in total.

From everything you've found in this conversation, build a single
table with these columns:

1. claim (one sentence, as it might appear in the piece)
2. the specific data behind it (record type, identifier, amount, date)
3. where I can verify it at the source (which registry, what to
   search for)
4. what's still missing before this could be published

Don't put anything in column 1 that doesn't have a record in column 2.
At the end, add a list titled OPEN QUESTIONS: things public data
can't answer, that I need to ask someone about directly.